Understanding the Praise/Worth Cycle

 

Have you ever noticed how some people thrive on frequent praise while others are content with occasional validation? This dynamic, which I call the “praise cycle” (or the “worth cycle” as it’s more correctly known), plays a crucial role in how individuals perceive their value and stay motivated in their work.

As a team leader , manager, or project manager, you really should know about this kind of stuff, so let’s talk about it:

What is the Praise/Worth Cycle?

The praise cycle refers to the frequency and form of validation a person needs to feel valued and motivated. For some, this could mean verbal affirmations, while for others, it’s tangible rewards like paychecks or promotions.

Understanding your own praise cycle, as well as those of your colleagues, can significantly impact workplace dynamics and personal satisfaction.

Think of it like telling your partner, “I love you.” They might already know it, but the act of verbalising it reinforces the bond. Similarly, in a workplace, individuals need their efforts acknowledged to varying degrees and in different ways.

The Spectrum of Praise Needs

The need for validation varies widely among individuals:

High-Need Individuals:

These individuals require frequent feedback. They may benefit from daily check ins or regular affirmations that their work is valued.

Example: A team member who thrives on being told they’re doing an excellent job during daily status calls.

Low-Need Individuals:

Some people are content with minimal feedback, such as an annual review or a steady paycheck. Example: A contractor who sees payment for their invoice as sufficient validation of their efforts.

Praise Cycles in Action

The praise cycle can vary not only in timing but also in source. Validation can come from peers, subordinates, or superiors, and it’s essential to recognise these dynamics:

Daily Feedback:

Individuals with a daily praise cycle may be perceived as needy, but accommodating their needs can improve productivity and morale.
In a cold hearted way this requires assessing whether the effort of providing constant feedback is outweighed by the value they bring to the team.

Monthly Feedback:

Contractors and salespeople often operate on a monthly cycle, where the payment of invoices or commission checks serves as validation. For these individuals, tangible results matter more than verbal praise.

Annual Feedback:

Long-term employees often rely on annual performance reviews or promotions to validate their contributions. While these reviews are a common corporate practice, they may lack the immediacy some individuals need to feel appreciated.

Long-Term Validation:

Visionaries and dreamers may measure their worth by progress toward ambitious goals, such as climbing the corporate ladder or achieving a significant personal milestone.

Types of Validation

Validation can take many forms, including:

Verbal Praise:

Positive affirmations like “You’ve done a great job this week” or “We couldn’t do this without you.”
Though sometimes dismissed as sycophantic, this form of feedback can be crucial for some individuals’ morale.

Organisational Recognition:

Titles, promotions, or increased responsibility can signify worth to some people. While they might seem superficial to others, these accolades often hold deep meaning for the recipient.

Tangible Rewards:

Pay raises, bonuses, or perks like company cars or extra vacation days provide concrete validation, and while sometimes dismissed with a “you are only in it for the money” if that is how a person judges their worth, then that is what you will need to provide to get the best from them.

Managing the Praise/Worth Cycle

To effectively navigate the praise cycle in yourself and others:

Understand Your Own Cycle:

Reflect on what motivates you. Is it verbal affirmation, tangible rewards, or career progression?

Be aware of how others might influence your perception of self-worth.

Adapt to Others’ Cycles:

As a leader or colleague, recognising the praise cycles of your team can help you build stronger relationships and work together better.
For example, a manager’s validation may come from their team’s praise, while team members might need daily or weekly encouragement.

Final Thoughts

Understanding the praise or worth cycle is not just about providing validation but also about building a culture where individuals feel valued and motivated.
While this might seem like a simple observational concept, its implications can profoundly impact workplace dynamics, personal growth, and overall satisfaction.
By recognising and respecting these cycles, you can create environments where everyone’s contributions are acknowledged in ways that actually really matter to them, whether through daily praise, tangible rewards, or long-term goals.

Ultimately, this awareness makes us better colleagues, leaders, and fellow humans.

How to start a corporate chat

 

Starting a conversation in a corporate chat client effectively is crucial nowadays, especially with the widespread use of chat platforms like Teams and Google Chat.
These tools can be incredibly helpful but also frustrating if not used properly. One of the biggest pitfalls is failing to start a message in a way that does not trigger a negative response.

When beginning a chat, start with a simple greeting, a brief mention of the topic, and what you hope to achieve from the conversation.

This approach is straightforward but very effective. For example: “Good morning! Can I pick your brains on Project X?, I need to give a presentation on it tomorrow, and I’m after some info I am missing.” This includes a greeting, an indication of the topic, and sets expectations and time constraints—all in a single sentence.

This structure helps others gauge the priority of your message and reduces any confusion.

In addition, avoid vague or overly chatty openers, like “Good morning. How are you today?” spread across multiple lines, which leaves the recipient wondering what you need and also frustrated, especially if you are a slow typer or expecting responses.

Finally, try to avoid abrupt messages that skip all courtesy, such as jumping straight to “Is System X down?” While this may be acceptable in urgent situations like outages, omitting basic courtesies in routine requests (like “Is Report X ready for next week’s meeting?”) can come across as rude and dismissive.

2024: A Year in Review

This year has been without a doubt one of the most satisfying ones of my life, personally and professionally, A solid year all around. Let’s, as normal break it down, then talk about 2025

Work and Professional Growth

On the work side, I’ve achieved a large percentage of what I wanted. Im very happy to be away from under the faceless control of the human resources machine and back to being a genuine consultant in a small dynamic company fixing larger corporate issues.

My clients seem to be really happy with what I’m doing for them, and I’ve enjoyed the most positive new working relationship I’ve had in a decade. It feels like I’ve transitioned from being a “contractor” to being recognised as part of a genuine vendor, which is a significant step forward.

The daily work itself has been both challenging and incredibly fulfilling. That makes all the difference. It’s not always easy, but it’s always worth it.

On the management side, I’ve learnt a lot. For years I’ve thought of myself as “a tech person who does some management.” But now, I’m fully embracing a dual identity: a manager who deeply understands technology and the business. It’s a shift that has required growth and adaptation, but I’m leaning into it (see, I’m even using management phrases).

This year, I’ve also had the unique opportunity to observe and learn from a wide spectrum of project managers across a multinational organisation from the inside and finally see what drives them to do the things that seem so insane from the outside. The contrasts have been eye-opening. Seeing the range of styles and approaches has taught me lessons every single day.

Personal Life

On the personal front, this year has been full of joy. One of the biggest highlights? Reuniting with my son in a proper way. Watching him thrive and get engaged to an absolutely wonderful person has been a source of immense pride and happiness.

For the first time in over a decade, we’re celebrating Christmas together, three generations under one roof. That’s a moment I’ve dreamed of for years.

Health wise, things are stable. My lungs, which have been a longstanding issue, are under control thanks to excellent care and support, and though there has been little growth, I dont feel much older.

What are the goals for 2025

I want to focus on growing my management skills. GOOD management has far more to it than most people actually do. People assume that once they’ve earned a managerial title, they’ve mastered the art. That’s far from true.

Just like in any profession, growth in management is a continuous journey. This year, my goal is to improve by doing, learning from hands on experiences rather than formalised programs.

I’m fortunate to have a couple of significant projects lined up, and I’m determined to deliver them as things of grace and beauty. Alongside this, I need to keep up with my knowledge in business and the tech side.

Admittedly, 2024 was quieter on the business knowledge side with how busy its been, so this year I plan to dive back into my Chartered Insurance Institute exams and get at least a few of them taken.

On the technology side, my main clients are heavily Azure focused, so staying current in that area is non negotiable. Thankfully, I’ve been lucky to work with colleagues who, because I approach them with respect, are patient and willing to share their more up to date knowledge. This collaboration has been an incredible learning experience.

On the personal side, one goal I’ve repeatedly set (and neglected) is returning to fencing. This time, I’m determined. Haverstock fencing club has added Saturday sessions, making it much easier to commit to regular practice.

Another priority is addressing a new back problem, which stems from years of sitting at a computer. Thankfully, my fantastic personal trainer is guiding me through this, helping me strengthen my body and alleviate the issue.

This year also marks my 50th birthday, and I’m determined to get my weight down to 100 kilograms. It’s not just about the number; it’s about not looking like an old fart at the parties this year.

Lastly, I want to actually get a grip on the model painting. I’ve spent too much time procrastinating and pottering around rather than doing. This year, I’ll focus on actually painting a few armies, running a few campaigns, and playing some actual games.

The Opposite of Grim Dark

As someone who paints mainly Warhammer miniatures, I often paint in what’s known as “Grimdark” style. This term applies both to the narrative (“In the grim, dark future, there is only war”) and to the painting style itself, which emphasises a gritty, weathered look with battle damage and grime.


Within grimdark, there’s a spectrum, from simply shadowed effects just using things like “Nuln Oil” shading, to the intense enamel painting that embodies the full “Grimdark” experience that you see with Kendon Oates work.


But I’ve always been curious about the opposite of this style: that bright, clean, shiny 80’s aesthetic seen in settings like Star Trek and exemplified in Corvus Belli promotion pictures. 1


I recently discovered that the narrative name for this is “hope punk”. Settings like Star Wars and Star Trek fall into this category, but I could never find a painting equivalent or good guides on achieving such a look. Thankfully, I’ve recently found both.


And while I’m not completely satisfied with the term 2, “iPod Future” seems to fit: it’s that sleek, chrome, brand-new world look I was after.


As for guides, there were many subpar resources, but Corvus Belli came to the rescue for a formal book, specifically through Angel Giraldez’s Masterclass Volumes 1 and 2 3.


Some key features that distinguish “iPod Future” from “Grimdark” are:

  1. Glazing with lighter colours instead of dark tones.
  2. Highlighting up to near-white layered highlights.
  3. Using coloured washes instead of traditional dark shades.
  4. layered highlights 4

So there you go, hope this helps someone else on the same search as me, I finish with a definition of “iPod Future painting” :
“It’s a nightmare realm of none metallic metals, glazes, and prodigious tactical use of off-whites and pure whites to create lens flare effects.”

  1. I used a couple of them for the banner of this post.[]
  2. , it feels aged rather than timeless[]
  3. ,I ended up buying my ones from element games as the official site had broken SSL[]
  4. ,My definition of hell[]

The Unintended Consequences of Fiscal Responsibility

 

I’ve noticed something recently, and its finance wrecking projects. Now, don’t get me wrong, finance teams are just doing their jobs, safeguarding budgets, managing risk, and all that good stuff. But occasionally, their well-intentioned actions can inadvertently turn projects into grey mush.

This is because there’s been a big push lately towards goal-based deliverables, essentially fixed-price projects under a fancy new name. On the surface, this sounds sensible: clear expectations, predictable costs.

But what often gets bundled into these contracts, thanks to diligent finance and legal teams, are penalty clauses, those little contractual bombs that promise severe consequences if deliverables aren’t met.

The idea makes sense in theory: if a vendor doesn’t meet expectations, they face penalties. But in practice, it’s often a nightmare. Vendors, already feeling stressed from fixed-price constraints, become understandably cautious, even penny-pinching.

Every extra detail, every moment of generosity, or even a minor freebie given to clients becomes a direct hit to their bottom line. Add in severe penalty clauses (sometimes, unbelievably, with unlimited financial exposure), and vendors start playing defence.

The outcome? Projects shift from being innovative and collaborative efforts to a game of “minimum viable product.” Every potential corner is cut, flair and creativity vanish, and teams deliver just enough to fulfill the contractual obligations, nothing more. The joy, enthusiasm, and innovative spark that can differentiate groundbreaking projects from merely adequate ones are often lost.

From a client’s perspective, this cautious approach is problematic. Companies typically outsource projects precisely because they lack the internal expertise or resources, so it makes sense to leverage the specialist skills of vendors. By introducing overly harsh and rigid contractual conditions, clients unintentionally stifle the very expertise they’re paying for. Opportunities to create truly differentiated, standout products vanish.

And here’s the irony: being overly cautious and protective financially might safeguard budgets, but it can also rob clients of the chance to genuinely innovate or take the lead in their market. Instead of getting a product that could have been the best in class, they settle for something safe, predictable, and frankly, dull, often making the project a waste of money, as you could have just stuck with what you had.

Fiscal responsibility is essential, but perhaps balance caution with courage and encourage your vendors enough freedom to deliver excellence, not just adequacy.